Resultados de búsqueda: radicalism in religion philosophy and social de lunt george

Paperback / softback. New.

New.

Paperback / softback. New.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

hardcover. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

hardcover. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

Hardback. New.

paperback. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

Boston: Little, Brown and Co, 1858. First edition, 12mo, pp. 79, [1]; original green cloth, gilt-lettered spine; ex-Johns Hopkins and University of Maryland, with stamps; front free endpaper loosening; all else very good. The essays are: "Emerson as a Lecturer," "Revival Sermons," " "Fair Play to Women," and "The Philosophy of Abolition." Afro-Americana 8598; Sabin 67423.

hardcover. Good. Access codes and supplements are not guaranteed with used items. May be an ex-library book.

Boston: Little, Brown & Co, 1858. First Edition. First printing. 12mo (18cm); publisher's brown embossed cloth; 79pp. Front and rear endpapers have been excised; moderate aging and wear to cloth; complete and Good. Lunt (1803-1885) was chief editor of the Boston Daily Courier from 1857-1863. The four articles reprinted here are titled "Revival Sermons;" "Mr. Ralph Waldo Emerson as a Lecturer;" "Fair Play to Women;" and "The Philosophy of Abolition." Lunt being a loyal Democrat, this final essay is predictably conciliatory towards the South, repeating many of the standard religious arguments defending slavery - a point of view which would certainly have made him appear "radical" (or at least unpopular) in Boston during this time.