The Agency and the Hill: CIA's Relationship with Congress, 1946-2004

Washington DC: Central Intelligence Agency, Center for the Study of Intelligence, 2008. Presumed First Edition, First printing. Trade paperback. Very good. xvi, 389, [3] pages. Footnotes. Illustrations. Appendices. Bibliography. Index. Cover has minor wear. L. Britt Snider, American Government executive. Served to captain United States Army, 1969-1971, Vietnam. Member Virginia Bar Association, District of Columbia Bar Association. Career highlights include: Counsel judiciary subcommittee on constitutional rights, United States Senate, Washington, 1971-1975; counsel select commission on intelligence, United States Senate, Washington, 1975-1976; partner, Ketner & Snider, Salisbury, North Carolina, 1976-1977; counsel government operations subcommittee on government information, United States House Representatives, Washington, 1977; assistant deputy undersecretary counterintelligence and security, Department Defense, Washington, 1977-1987; minority counsel, United States Senate Intelligence Committee, Washington, 1987-1989; general counsel, United States Senate Intelligence Committee, Washington, 1989-1995; staff director commission on roles and capabilities of the United States Intelligence Community., United States Senate Intelligence Committee, Washington, 1995-1996; senior fellow, Center for Study of Intelligence, 1996-1997; special counsel to director, Central Intelligence Agency, 1997-1998; inspector general, Central Intelligence Agency, since 1998. Staff director Commission to Review Security Practices and Procedures Department Defense, Washington, 1985. CSI was founded in 1974 in response to Director of Central Intelligence James Schlesinger's desire to create within CIA an organization that could "think through the functions of intelligence and bring the best intellects available to bear on intelligence problems." The
center, comprising professional historians and experienced practitioners, attempts to document lessons learned from past operations, explore the needs and expectations of intelligence consumers, and stimulate serious debate on current and future intelligence challenges. This is a study of the CIA's relationship with Congress. It encompasses the period from the creation of the Agency until 2004—the era of the DCIs. When Congress created a new position in December 2004—the director of national intelligence—to supersede the director of central intelligence (DCI) as head of the US Intelligence Community, it necessarily changed the dynamic between the CIA and the Congress. While the director of the Agency would continue to represent its interests on Capitol Hill, he or she would no longer speak as the
head of US intelligence. While 2008 is too early to assess how this change will affect the Agency's relationship with Congress, it is safe to say it will never be quite the same. This study is not organized as one might expect. It does not describe what occurred between the Agency and Congress in chronological order nor does it purport to describe every interaction that occurred over the period encompassed by the study. Rather it attempts to describe what the relationship was like over time and then look at what it produced in seven discrete areas. Part I describes how Congress and the Agency related to each other over the period covered by the study. As it happens, this period conveniently breaks down into two major segments: the years before the creation of the select committees on intelligence (1946-76) and the years after the creation of these committees (1976-2004). The arrangements that Congress put in place during the earlier period to provide oversight and tend to the needs of the Agency were distinctly different from those put in place in the mid-1970s and beyond.
Over the entire period, moreover, the Agency shared intelligence with the Congress and had other interaction with its members that affected the relationship. This, too, is described in part I. Part II describes what the relationship produced over time in seven discrete
areas: legislation affecting the Agency; programs and budget; oversight of analysis; oversight of collection; oversight of covert action; oversight of security and personnel matters; and the Senate confirmation process. It highlights what the principal issues have been for Congress in each area as well as how those issues have been handled.