The Power of the Mother's Imagination over the Foetus examin'd.: In Answer to Dr. Daniel Turner's Book intitled A Defence of the XIIth Chapter of the First Part of a Treatise, De Morbis Cutaneis

FOLK BELIEFS ON THE POWER OF MATERNAL IMAGINATION ON THE FOETUS CONFRONTED
first edition small 8vo. [2], xi, [3], 143, [1 (errata)]pp., type ornaments and decorative initial letters, mid-nineteenth century buff cloth, spine gilt lettered, title page slightly dusty, else very good.

ESTC t117265
Blondel (Paris, 1665/6–1734), physician, after a medical education at Leiden in 1700 established a practice in London and was made a licentiate of the Royal College of Physicians in 1711. "In 1727 he published an anonymous work entitled The strength of imagination in pregnant women examined; and the opinion that marks and deformities in children arise from thence, demonstrated to be a vulgar error. He later claimed to have written this work in response to Mary Toft's delusion that her unfulfilled cravings for rabbit actually caused her to give birth to a litter of rabbits. However, another member of the college, Daniel Turner, deemed Blondel's work to be an attack on a chapter, 'Spots and marks of a diverse resemblance imprest upon the skin of the foetus, by the force of the mother's fancy', in his book, De morbis cutaneis, a work on skin disease, first published in 1714. In September 1729 Turner responded with a pamphlet addressing Blondel's work. Later that year, Blondel issued a second work, The Power of the Mother's Imagination over the Foetus Examined. Blondel presented the whole issue of the power of the mother's imagination as a vulgar error, scorning the credulity of the medical practitioners involved in the Toft case. He represented the belief of the 'imaginationists' as irrational and mathematically unsound, using a deductive Newtonian approach to sustain his hypothesis regarding the maternal imagination. Blondel and Turner, in polemical pamphleteering common to this period, both presented arguments which gained support for many years. Their influence spread beyond London, and Blondel's 1729 pamphlet was translated into French (1737), Dutch (1737), German (1756), and Italian (1760). The widespread contemporary interest in this dispute suggests that Blondel, together with Turner, raised the phenomenon of the maternal imagination from an issue of folk belief to a concern of eighteenth-century medicine" [O.D.N.B.].